Network Administration / Windows 2000 Server

Combining sharing and NTFS permissions in Windows 2000

In this article, I'll cover the tricky subject of what happens when you combine permissions. After reading this piece, you should be able to set up and troubleshoot permissions on your network and clients more quickly.

Rules for combining permissions

Understanding how different types of permissions interact isn't too difficult, as long as you stick to these basic rules.

Same permission type (either sharing or NTFS)

When working within a certain permission type (sharing or NTFS), permissions are cumulative. The most lenient setting wins for a particular user or group. Deny always overrides Allow and negates any permission with which it conflicts.

Mixing sharing and NTFS permissions

When there's a difference between the sharing permission and the NTFS permission, the most restrictive setting wins.

Permissions across groups

Permissions are not cumulative across groups; each group's permission is calculated separately. For example, if a user is a member of Group A that has Full Control sharing permission but no NTFS permission for an object and of Group B that has Full Control NTFS permission but no sharing permission for the object, that user has no permission for the object.

Examples

Let's look at some examples. Let's say that on John's PC, there is a folder called FOLDER-A containing a file called PRIVATE.DOC. John has shared FOLDER-A with the Marketing group with Change permission and with the Everyone group with Read permission. In the NTFS permissions for the folder, he has allowed for the Marketing group to have only Read access. He has removed the default permissions to the folder for the Everyone group.

If Sarah from Marketing accesses PRIVATE.DOC, will she be able to make changes to it? The Marketing group has Change (for Sharing) and Read (for NTFS), with a net result of Read. The Everyone group has Read (for Sharing) and None (for NTFS), with a net result of None. So Sarah's permissions are the least restrictive of Read and None—in other words, Read. So no, she cannot make changes.

 
Sharing
permission
NTFS
permission
Net
permission
Marketing group Change Read Read
Everyone group Read None None
Cumulative permission     Read

Now, suppose John adds another group to his list of NTFS permissions: Managers. He gives the Managers group Modify access to FOLDER-A. If Sarah is a member of the Managers group, will she now be able to make changes to PRIVATE.DOC? The answer is still no, because even though permissions are cumulative within a type, they are calculated as a whole on each group. As you can see below, the new Managers group has no net permission to the folder because it has no Sharing permission, so it doesn't help Sarah to be able to modify the file.

 
Sharing
permission
NTFS
permission
Net
permission
Marketing group Change Read Read
Managers group None Modify None
Everyone group Read None None
Cumulative permission     Read

Hint

Permission changes don’t take effect until the end user logs off and logs back on. After John changes the permissions, Sarah must log off and back on again or close the network connection to John’s PC and reopen it in order for his permission changes to take effect on Sarah’s end.

If John wanted to make sure Sarah had the ability to modify the file, he could :

  • Give the Marketing group Modify (or better) permission under NTFS permissions.
  • Give the Managers group Change permission under sharing permissions.

Let’s say John takes the first option and changes the Marketing group’s NTFS permission to Modify. Now the chart looks like this:

 
Sharing
permission
NTFS
permission
Net
permission
Marketing group Change Modify Change/Modify
Managers group None Modify None
Everyone group Read None None
Cumulative permission     Change/Modify

Note

Sharing and NTFS permissions use two different terms, Change and Modify, but both allow Sarah to make edits to the file.

Now, suppose John uses the NTFS special permissions to deny the Managers group the Write permission. Will Sarah be able to edit the file? No, because the Deny option settings override any Allow settings. Even though the Marketing group still has the rights to edit the file, Sarah is also a member of the Managers group which is specifically denied access.

 
Sharing
permission
NTFS
permission
Net
permission
Marketing group Change Modify Change/Modify
Managers group None Deny Write Deny Write
Everyone group Read None None
Cumulative permission     Deny Write

If John wanted Sarah to be able to change the file but nobody else from the Managers group, he could either remove Sarah from that group or create a separate group containing everyone from Managers except Sarah and deny that group the Write access instead of denying the Managers group.

Practice

The best way to get more confident in your understanding of permissions is to play around with them. Try re-creating the preceding scenario on two client PCs on your network and then experimenting with more "what if" scenarios. For example, what if:

  • John turns off Deny Write for Managers and simply deselects the Allow checkbox for the Managers group? Can Sarah then edit the file?
  • Sarah then tries to delete the file PRIVATE.DOC? Can she do it with her current permissions?
  • John removes all permissions from the folder? Can he still read and modify the file himself?
  • Sarah creates a subfolder within FOLDER-A on John's PC? Can John delete it?

Conclusion

In this article, you learned what the rules are when different sets of permissions interact. You also gained some practice in determining net permissions when NTFS and sharing permissions conflict for a user in multiple groups. You now have my permission to set up your network and client machines for the most robust security obtainable in a Windows environment.

Contact Us | Authors | Subject Index | RSS Feeds

Copyright ©2007 Setup32.com